Glossary entry

English term or phrase:

But for

English answer:

except for (the effect of)

Added to glossary by Jack Doughty
Dec 7, 2007 19:26
16 yrs ago
21 viewers *
English term

But for

English Bus/Financial Law: Taxation & Customs Formation of SE
Hi everybody,
I would like to understand the meaning of "but for" in the following:

"Where tax would, but for the Mergers Directive, have been chargeable in the member State in which the permanent establishment is located, Part 18 of the Taxes Act 1988 (double taxation relief), including any arrangements having effect by virtue of section 788 (double taxation agreements), shall have effect as if the amount of tax that would, but for the Mergers Directive, have been charged in respect of the transfer of the chargeable intangible assets, had actually been charged."

Thank you very much
Change log

Dec 10, 2007 14:35: Jack Doughty changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/141759">Ali Al awadi's</a> old entry - "But for"" to ""except for the effect of the Mergers Directive""

Discussion

Ali Al awadi (asker) Dec 10, 2007:
Thanks a lot everybody.

Kind regards
Ali Al-awadi

Responses

+4
8 mins
Selected

except for the effect of the Mergers Directive

Where tax would have been chargeable, except for the fact that the Mergers Directive specifies that it is not chargeable.
Note from asker:
Thank you very much, Jack.
Peer comment(s):

agree Bernhard Sulzer : I think that goes in the right direction.
2 mins
Thank you.
agree TrueBaller : except for...
9 mins
Thank you.
agree orientalhorizon
13 hrs
Thank you.
agree Tatiana N. (X) : yes, "but for" is a standard element designed to prove the element of causation
22 hrs
Thank you.
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
+3
8 mins

Had the Mergers Directive not existed

The amount of tax would have been changed if the Mergers Directive not existed.

NOT "with the exception of"
Peer comment(s):

agree Richard Benham
2 hrs
Thank you. By the way, I meant "charged" :-)
agree Mehmet Hascan
2 hrs
Thank you.
agree orientalhorizon
13 hrs
Something went wrong...
+4
10 mins

if it were not for

It means that if it were not for the Mergers Directive the tax would have been charged differently
Peer comment(s):

agree Richard Benham
2 hrs
Thanks, Richard.
agree Mehmet Hascan
2 hrs
Thanks, Mehmet.
agree orientalhorizon
13 hrs
Thanks, orientalhorizon.
agree Alfa Trans (X)
1 day 20 hrs
Something went wrong...
+3
10 mins

if it had not been not been for

...tax would have been chargeable, if it had not been for the Mergers Directive...

...tax would have been chargeable, however, due to the existence of the Mergers Directive, it was not chargeable.
Peer comment(s):

agree Richard Benham
2 hrs
agree Mehmet Hascan
2 hrs
agree orientalhorizon
13 hrs
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search