Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
But for
English answer:
except for (the effect of)
Added to glossary by
Jack Doughty
Dec 7, 2007 19:26
16 yrs ago
21 viewers *
English term
But for
English
Bus/Financial
Law: Taxation & Customs
Formation of SE
Hi everybody,
I would like to understand the meaning of "but for" in the following:
"Where tax would, but for the Mergers Directive, have been chargeable in the member State in which the permanent establishment is located, Part 18 of the Taxes Act 1988 (double taxation relief), including any arrangements having effect by virtue of section 788 (double taxation agreements), shall have effect as if the amount of tax that would, but for the Mergers Directive, have been charged in respect of the transfer of the chargeable intangible assets, had actually been charged."
Thank you very much
I would like to understand the meaning of "but for" in the following:
"Where tax would, but for the Mergers Directive, have been chargeable in the member State in which the permanent establishment is located, Part 18 of the Taxes Act 1988 (double taxation relief), including any arrangements having effect by virtue of section 788 (double taxation agreements), shall have effect as if the amount of tax that would, but for the Mergers Directive, have been charged in respect of the transfer of the chargeable intangible assets, had actually been charged."
Thank you very much
Change log
Dec 10, 2007 14:35: Jack Doughty changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/141759">Ali Al awadi's</a> old entry - "But for"" to ""except for the effect of the Mergers Directive""
Responses
+4
8 mins
Selected
except for the effect of the Mergers Directive
Where tax would have been chargeable, except for the fact that the Mergers Directive specifies that it is not chargeable.
Note from asker:
Thank you very much, Jack. |
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Bernhard Sulzer
: I think that goes in the right direction.
2 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
TrueBaller
: except for...
9 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
orientalhorizon
13 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Tatiana N. (X)
: yes, "but for" is a standard element designed to prove the element of causation
22 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
+3
8 mins
Had the Mergers Directive not existed
The amount of tax would have been changed if the Mergers Directive not existed.
NOT "with the exception of"
NOT "with the exception of"
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Richard Benham
2 hrs
|
Thank you. By the way, I meant "charged" :-)
|
|
agree |
Mehmet Hascan
2 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
orientalhorizon
13 hrs
|
+4
10 mins
if it were not for
It means that if it were not for the Mergers Directive the tax would have been charged differently
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Richard Benham
2 hrs
|
Thanks, Richard.
|
|
agree |
Mehmet Hascan
2 hrs
|
Thanks, Mehmet.
|
|
agree |
orientalhorizon
13 hrs
|
Thanks, orientalhorizon.
|
|
agree |
Alfa Trans (X)
1 day 20 hrs
|
+3
10 mins
if it had not been not been for
...tax would have been chargeable, if it had not been for the Mergers Directive...
...tax would have been chargeable, however, due to the existence of the Mergers Directive, it was not chargeable.
...tax would have been chargeable, however, due to the existence of the Mergers Directive, it was not chargeable.
Discussion
Kind regards
Ali Al-awadi